Blairbash.org

Search Quotes 

#12789

77

Dec. 21, 2023, 8:53 a.m.

⚐ Report
//chaotic rose anthology, december 20 "There are two ways we can go about this. When the teacher stops talking for a second, you can start talking about bullshit that's unrelated to class, or you can stop, and be quiet, and focus on what's happening in class." "Don't get mad at me, Katz! Or get mad at me, but suppress those feelings, as I often do." "I'm not going to look at the clock, because it would make me sad. ... There's no clock anyway? Great!" "Now, here's something new that will change your life. ... For the better. I have to clarify that every time." "I'm just retelling the story from october, but this time I'm using the word 'consistency' a lot." "He uses the pseudosphere, which is at my house, as part of the Christmas tree, so I don't have it with me now." "Perfect. And when I say 'perfect', I'm really crying inside. But it's only on the inside, so that's okay." "[Fus making an announcement is] the voice of nightmares." "Now we're getting to the part of this class where I make fun of Schwartz a lot." "[Schwartz is] so influenced by modern mathematics. He's like a caricature of the 21st-century mathematician." "If you ask whether something is true, Schwartz will say 'what do you mean, true? I don't care about truth! Just tell me the axioms, and give me my peanut butter sandwiches, and my water, and I'll sit in my hammock and derive the theorems.'"

#12786

66

Dec. 20, 2023, 1:59 p.m.

⚐ Report
Choir: [Comes in and sings the Rudolph song] Kirk: Wow, Mr Rose doesn't care about this at all, he just want to see Agnesi Rose: ...yuh

#12762

22

Dec. 19, 2023, 2:57 p.m.

⚐ Report
Rose: last thing to define is the latus rectum Rose: very silly name but i didn't decide this

#12761

44

Dec. 19, 2023, 2:41 p.m.

⚐ Report
Rose: whose yellow drink is this Jesse: it's mine Saanvi: what is it Jesse: it's piss *takes a sip* Saanvi: ewwww Rose: well that was great, merry Christmas everybody

jesse had a bottled water bottle full of sussy yellow liquid on his desk

saanvi, jesse, pee, rose

#12752

1212

Dec. 18, 2023, 5:19 p.m.

⚐ Report
Rose: There we go. My first aleph of the year. Rose: They get progressively worse the more Judaism evaporates from my body.

#12735

115

Dec. 15, 2023, 11:16 a.m.

⚐ Report
Eric Yang: Mr. Rose once called William Roe a typo.

#12734

66

Dec. 14, 2023, 5:43 p.m.

⚐ Report
//after explaining uncountability of the real numbers Rose: If you want to feel even more confused ... //introduces the Cantor ternary set (pathological fractal) Rose: The Cantor set is uncountable. Do you all believe me on that? Katz: I don't believe that. Rose: Okay, Katz. I can prove it to you. You have to consider the ternary representation of the real numbers ... *starts explaining binary and ternary* Katz: Okay, I believe you now. The Cantor set is uncountable. Rose: Will you just play along? *continues proof*

a real number in [0, 1] is in the Cantor set iff it has no 1s in the ternary expansion, so any number in it is an infinite sequence of 0s and 2s, which is equivalent to the set of all real numbers in [0, 1] in binary

logic, infinity, rose, katz

#12733

66

Dec. 14, 2023, 5:38 p.m.

⚐ Report
//Rose finds a lost phone right when it receives a call from "Yanet" Rose: Hello, Yanet. Whose phone is this? //Rose hands the phone to arbitrary Student Rose: You deal with this problem.

#12732

44

Dec. 14, 2023, 5:36 p.m.

⚐ Report
//chaotic rose anthology, december 14 "Maybe you're being way too precise, or maybe you're being just the appropriate amount of precise." "What are you saying? ... Wait. Let's watch a cute little video first." "Those of you who are learning this for the first time should be feeling nervous, as you realise that there are too many real numbers. There's just so freaking many of them!" "If you've spent between 0 and 20 hours staring at this poster, as you should ..." "On the fourth page, I got kinda lazy, so I did all the work myself."

#12712

1010

Dec. 12, 2023, 10:58 p.m.

⚐ Report
// working through a Fitch-style proof; ∀xƎy[P(y,x) -> ~Ǝz(P(y,z) ∧ P(z,y)] Rose: So let's take a guy. What should we name our guy? Student: Raul. Rose: Okay, Raul it is. So if someone loves Raul, then it's not the case that they have somebody they love who also loves them. // later Rose: So let's say Raul loves someone. I need a name for the person Raul loves. John: Paul. Rose: Paula. Okay. John: No, just Paul. Rose: Oh, straight Paul? Okay. Stephen: I'm not so sure if "straight" is the right word to use here.